Search results for "EU regulations"

showing 8 items of 8 documents

Agreements regarding the property relations of transnational couples and their effects under the application of the twin regulations

2021

It is a true and verifiable fact that the family institution has evolved over recent decades in Europe and throughout the world, but not uniformly or at the same time. This is because it is influenced by social and cultural connotations specific to each State. All of which are respected under EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104. This work analyses the Twins Regulations, that gives the couples the possibility of choosing the jurisdiction (art. 7) and applicable legal system underpinning the property consequences of the marriage and registered partnerships (art. 22.1). However, we try to show you these rules absolute freedom of choice is not granted to the parties, because this freedom is …

but not uniformly or at the same time. This is because it is influenced by social and cultural connotations specific to each State. All of which are respected under EU Regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104. This work analyses the Twins Regulationsreglamentos gemelos. 76 109:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]that gives the couples the possibility of choosing the jurisdiction (art. 7) and applicable legal system underpinning the property consequences of the marriage and registered partnerships (art. 22.1). Howeveracuerdosley aplicableproperty relationsMaría José It is a true and verifiable fact that the family institution has evolved over recent decades in Europe and throughout the worldUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113550 Agreements regarding the property relations of transnational couples and their effects under the application of the twin regulations Cazorla Gonzáleztwin Regulations.relaciones económicaswe try to show you these rules absolute freedom of choice is not granted to the partiesbecause this freedom is conditional. This freedom of choice is limited for several reasons that we analysed in this paper. Cross-border couplesParejas transfronterizasagreementapplicable law
researchProduct

The role of the agreement as a tool for management of property relations in cases of cross border marriages and civil unions/partnerships registered …

2021

The essay examines the role of the agreement as a tool for managing property relationships in crossborder marriages and registered partnerships, in light of EU Regulations 1103 and 1104 of 2016, on the property regimes of international married or registered couples. The main prerogative of such acts is the recognition of the parties? freedom to choose the court and the applicable law. The law governing the matrimonial property regimes, or the property consequences of registered partnerships, has universal scope. This agreement in the form envisaged, which is backed by the need for legal certainty and predictability of the applicable rules, means that the spouses, in family problems which ha…

with reference to the ?applicable law?and of common law systems which give effect to a moderate interpretation of the will of the courts. Go away. Cross-border marriages and registered partnershipsthe hard base on which the contractual structure provided for in the Regulation is builthas universal scope. This agreement in the form envisagedMatrimonios y parejas registradas trasfronterizaswhich strengthens the objectives of both civil law systemsmeans that the spousesautonomía contractual. 242 251which is backed by the need for legal certainty and predictability of the applicable rulesboth explicitly and implicitly. Thusare faced with a uniform system of rules on ?conflict? which can resolve them. Thereforeforo y ley aplicableor the property consequences of registered partnershipswhich open the way to a moderate interpretation of general clauses by the courts:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]Maria Gabriella The essay examines the role of the agreement as a tool for managing property relationships in crossborder marriages and registered partnershipsthe court and the applicable lawuniform systemcontractual autonomy.2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113560 The role of the agreement as a tool for management of property relations in cases of cross border marriages and civil unions/partnerships registered under the EU regulations nr. 1103 and 1104/2016. Rossisistema uniformein family problems which have cross-border implicationsUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASthe contractual autonomy in this provision appears to be the first point of connection between the different systemson the property regimes of international married or registered couples. The main prerogative of such acts is the recognition of the parties? freedom to choose the court and the applicable law. The law governing the matrimonial property regimesRegulation 1103 provides ample scope for contractual autonomyin light of EU Regulations 1103 and 1104 of 2016
researchProduct

Public policy in families and successions regulations : the case of ?talaq?

2021

According to EU Regulations on transnational families and successions, a foreign rule remains without effect if it is deemed contrary to the so-called public policy (ordre public) of the forum?s legal system. As a consequence, judges have to evaluate whether the application of foreign law is incompatible with fundamental principles of the domestic law, especially whether it would constitute a violation against human rights. An outstanding controversial issue is today represented by Islamic repudiation (talaq): two contrasting Italian judicial decisions of August 2020 may illustrate how difficult it could be to determine what public policy is.

:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]Marco According to EU Regulations on transnational families and successionsjudges have to evaluate whether the application of foreign law is incompatible with fundamental principles of the domestic law2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113559 Public policy in families and successions regulations the case of ?talaq? Rizzutimigrationhuman rightsa foreign rule remains without effect if it is deemed contrary to the so-called public policy (ordre public) of the forum?s legal system. As a consequenceespecially whether it would constitute a violation against human rights. An outstanding controversial issue is today represented by Islamic repudiation (talaq): two contrasting Italian judicial decisions of August 2020 may illustrate how difficult it could be to determine what public policy is. Public policymigracióntalaq. 221 241Orden públicoUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAStwo contrasting Italian judicial decisions of August 2020 may illustrate how difficult it could be to determine what public policy is. Public policy [especially whether it would constitute a violation against human rights. An outstanding controversial issue is today represented by Islamic repudiation (talaq)]talaq.derechos humanos
researchProduct

Party autonomy regarding jurisdiction under the property regimes regulations

2021

The main accomplishment of the Property Regimes Regulations lies in their bringing more coherence into the cross-border family law adjudication. In the field of international jurisdiction, they strive to align the competence in couples? patrimony disputes to that in succession and in separation proceedings, or else to align the competence of the courts to the applicable law. These tendencies are clearly visible in the Regulations? provisions on choice of court agreements. Namely, the Regulations allow for such agreements, but severely limit parties? choice and the possible effects of these clauses. When succession or separation proceedings are pending, it is often only possible to institute…

party autonomy.registered couples? propertyit is often only possible to institute patrimonial disputes at the same court as the said proceedings. When proceedings concerning matrimonial or registered partners? property are initiated without previously pending succession or divorce proceedingshoweveror else to align the competence of the courts to the applicable law. These tendencies are clearly visible in the Regulations? provisions on choice of court agreements. Namelyanalogy with other EU regulations and the CJEU case-law can be of help. The critical eye of the doctrine isrégimen económico-matrimonialRegulation 1104/2016mainly cast on the unpredictable fate of the choice of court agreements under the Regulations. The paper analyses the complex regulation of the choice-ofcourt agreements in the Property Regimes Regulationsautonomía de parte. 274 291draws attention to open questions and provides possible answers. Choice-of-court agreementjurisdictionmatrimonial propertybut severely limit parties? choice and the possible effects of these clauses. When succession or separation proceedings are pendingthey strive to align the competence in couples? patrimony disputes to that in succession and in separation proceedings:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]parties can avail themselves of a fairly limited list of options to choose a court from. The Regulations leave several questions regarding choice of court agreements unanswered. Oftenjurisdicciónthe Regulations allow for such agreementsAcuerdo de elección del fororégimen de parejas registradasor else when the necessary consent to the joinder is not given2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113562 Party autonomy regarding jurisdiction under the property regimes regulations Kramberger ?kerlJerca The main accomplishment of the Property Regimes Regulations lies in their bringing more coherence into the cross-border family law adjudication. In the field of international jurisdictionReglamento 1103/2016UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASRegulation 1103/2016Reglamento 1104/2016
researchProduct

Property and cross-border couples from the perspective of European regulation

2021

The family property regimes constitute a relevant sector of the EU regulatory framework strongly connected with fundamental rights policies. Family property offers specific issues which need to balance individual rights with general interests, especially in matter of real estate property. The fragmentation of the discipline in EU Family law, the diversity of the domestic rules regarding rights in rem requires a large use of flexibility from EU legislator and EU legal professionals. The discipline provides by EU Regulations 1103 and 1104/2016 could be an interesting example to manage cross-border couple?s interests: the principles of universality and unity have to be used appropriately and, …

:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]familia2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113561 Property and cross-border couples from the perspective of European regulation RuggerifamilyLucia The family property regimes constitute a relevant sector of the EU regulatory framework strongly connected with fundamental rights policies. Family property offers specific issues which need to balance individual rights with general intereststhe best solution is ?retraction? and ?adaptation? of domestic legal framework. Propertythe principles of universality and unity have to be used appropriately and [the diversity of the domestic rules regarding rights in rem requires a large use of flexibility from EU legislator and EU legal professionals. The discipline provides by EU Regulations 1103 and 1104/2016 could be an interesting example to manage cross-border couple?s interests]régimen económicoespecially in matter of real estate property. The fragmentation of the discipline in EU Family lawparejas transfronterizas. 252 273property regimescross-border couples.UNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASPropiedadthe diversity of the domestic rules regarding rights in rem requires a large use of flexibility from EU legislator and EU legal professionals. The discipline provides by EU Regulations 1103 and 1104/2016 could be an interesting example to manage cross-border couple?s interests: the principles of universality and unity have to be used appropriately andin some case
researchProduct

Pre-marital and pre-unional financial agreements and their circulation in the context of the new EU regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104

2021

Regulations (EU) 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 provide spouses and partners with the possibility to conclude agreements for the organization of their property regime but do not detail their content and structure. Moreover, while the possibility to conclude those agreements even prior to the marriage or the conclusion of a registered partnership is a valuable innovation in comparison with other European Regulations in family matters, some choices made by the European legislator on applicable law will likely be source of inconveniences. Furthermore, as for their recognition and enforcement in the participating Member States ? which will be based on the same rules enacted for decisions, authentic in…

:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]reglamentos UE 34 51where the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court is steadily opposed to their acceptance. : Pre-marital agreementswhile the possibility to conclude those agreements even prior to the marriage or the conclusion of a registered partnership is a valuable innovation in comparison with other European Regulations in family mattersPablo D. Regulations (EU) 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 provide spouses and partners with the possibility to conclude agreements for the organization of their property regime but do not detail their content and structure. Moreoversome choices made by the European legislator on applicable law will likely be source of inconveniences. FurthermoreEU regulationsacuerdos previos a la convivencialike ItalyUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASas for their recognition and enforcement in the participating Member States ? which will be based on the same rules enacted for decisionsand court settlements ? attention should be paid to their admissibility in some of themAcuerdos prematrimoniales2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113547 Pre-marital and pre-unional financial agreements and their circulation in the context of the new EU regulations 2016/1103 and 2016/1104 BrunoPre-marital agreements [where the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court is steadily opposed to their acceptance.]authentic instrumentspre-unional agreements
researchProduct

The variation of the law applicable to the family property regime in EU regulations n. 2016/1103 and 1104

2021

The essay examines the discipline of EU regulations n. 2016/1103 and 1104 concerning the identification of the law applicable to the family property regime. Specifically, the work reflects on problems arising after a change, during the relationship, of the substantial law applicable to the couple?s property regime.

the work reflects on problems arising after a changeof the substantial law applicable to the couple?s property regime. EU regulations n. 2016/1103 and n. 2016/1104:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]régimen económico familiarUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113552 The variation of the law applicable to the family property regime in EU regulations n. 2016/1103 and 1104 Ciprianiinternational private lawNicola The essay examines the discipline of EU regulations n. 2016/1103 and 1104 concerning the identification of the law applicable to the family property regime. Specificallyduring the relationshipfamily property regimeReglamentos UE n. 2016/1103 y n. 2016/1104derecho privado internacional. 118 129
researchProduct

Jurisdiction by connection and proper administration of justice under eu regulations 1103/2016 and 1104/2016

2021

The author analyses the rules of jurisdiction by connection set by Articles 4 and 5 of Regulations No. 1103 and 1104 of 2016 in matters of property regimes of transnational couples, taking into account the objective of proper administration of justice pursued within EU Civil judicial cooperation. The Twin Regulations provide for appropriate procedural tools to facilitate concentration of jurisdiction before the courts of the same Member State, establishing an important role for the choice-of-court agreement, especially where property regime issues arise in connection with a matrimonial case or a partnership dissolution case. As we wait for the implementation of these rules by national and E…

:CIENCIAS JURÍDICAS [UNESCO]related actions 148 163establishing an important role for the choice-of-court agreementley de sucesiones2386-4567 22661 Actualidad jurídica iberoamericana 587897 2021 15 8113554 Jurisdiction by connection and proper administration of justice under eu regulations 1103/2016 and 1104/2016 Pía Gasperiniproperty regimesJurisdictionfamily lawtaking into account the objective of proper administration of justice pursued within EU Civil judicial cooperation. The Twin Regulations provide for appropriate procedural tools to facilitate concentration of jurisdiction before the courts of the same Member StateUNESCO::CIENCIAS JURÍDICASMaría The author analyses the rules of jurisdiction by connection set by Articles 4 and 5 of Regulations No. 1103 and 1104 of 2016 in matters of property regimes of transnational couplesregímenes económicosthe author also explores some possible drawbacks they may present. Competencialey de familiaespecially where property regime issues arise in connection with a matrimonial case or a partnership dissolution case. As we wait for the implementation of these rules by national and European courtsacciones relacionadas.succession law
researchProduct